Jump to content

Talk:St John's College, Oxford

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image of Canterbury Quad

[edit]

This is a flickr image and is currently under review (as all flickr images under creative commons licence must be until confirmed by a trusted user) but all the attribution is correct, therefore it will be accepted, so it seems reasonable to add the image.

I find it hard to believe that Sir Oscar the Cat is the president.

Especially since he's dead (liver cancer; had to be put down). Greg carter 18:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But it wouldn't be impossible: Grace the Cat was elected MCR president in the 1980s, though she had a human "acting president" to help. Myopic Bookworm 11:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

notorious how exactly?

[edit]

"the notorious writers J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis " Daniel Barlow 14:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Undergraduate English, I'm afraid; they meant "famous". --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Famous alumni

[edit]

Famous alumni have to be famous: if they are not notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry then they are not notable enough to be listed here. I'm sure Mr. Sanjeev Sanyal is a good chap (Indian banker and economist, former Rhodes Scholar, etc.): if he's important enough for an entry, then write the entry first, and link from here afterwards. Myopic Bookworm 11:15, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For those who wish to and are editing from machines within Oxford University, you should be able to access the ODNB from here by clicking the "Dictionaries, Encyclopædias and Reference Works" under All Subjects, then click "(Oxford) Dictionary of National Biography" and then the top link - "Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Online (Direct access from Oxford)". You might wish to type "John's College, Oxford" in the 'search text of articles' box, only a few will be "so and so gave St John's College, Oxford a silver platter" and the like, the rest (with luck some hundreds) will be previous presidents, fellows, and students.--Alf melmac 19:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UniverSTD

[edit]

I was wondering if anyone else thinks that the allegations about St John's undergraduates and their sexual behaviour in this article should be included. Elmsters 13:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would say not. It's not well sourced (how would they get statistics on STD infection rates?), so doesn't provide any reliable information about the college. (This isn't a biography, but I'd say the third paragraph of WP:BLP#Reliable sources is relevant here.) If the story had been picked up by signficiant other sources we could include something like "The People reported in February 2007...", but nobody seems to have taken much notice of the story. EALacey 14:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:StJohnsGardenQuad.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:StJohnsGardenQuad.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford college crests: fair Use, replaceable, etc

[edit]
Image:St johns oxford crest.png | Number 1
Image:St-John's College Oxford Coat Of Arms.svg | Number 2

From the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_University_of_Oxford#Improved_and_Standardised_Images it seems there are many in favour of ChevronTango's works being adopted. Personally, I was a little uncomfortable with ChevronTango's replacement. I would far prefer to see the "official" version on Wikipedia. I don't really know whether ChevronTango's crests are appropriate for Wikipedia pages. I don't really know what the right answer is here. -- Fluteflute Talk Contributions 07:58, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to work with the Colleges to get these right. As it stands, the original image that I replaced for St Johns is actually incorrect, most egriguously in the use of stars for the estoilles. If St John's are unhappy about certain elements, for example the gradients, which I admit I took some liberties with, I would be happy to ammend my version (St Hugh's have already contacted me to this effect). As it stands, the advantage of my newer version is increased accuracy in many areas and its vector graphic nature means thats its valued by wikipedian policy far more than the previous PNG, on top of matching those for the other colleges. I agree that perhaps its not perfect, but I wouldn't have made it if I didn't think it has qualities greater than the one being discussed here. ChevronTango (talk) 19:36, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've tried to improve the image to be more inline with common usage. If anyone has preferances for colours or sizing let me know. I've improved the Estoilles and the ermine field so it should look better. ChevronTango (talk) 13:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this here as its more relevant and correct in this talk page. ChevronTango (talk) 14:25, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting information

[edit]

Not sure that this particularly goes in the article, but some interesting information anyway. Was looking at the 1997 college notes and came across a few bits of information:

  • there were 376 undergraduates, of which 148 were women [NB: almost exactly the same percentage of undergraduates as today]
  • the Tommy White bar was referred to as the "all new spacious College bar"
  • the college employed 81 domestic staff, 39 in the estate yar and 34 administrative staff

-- Fluteflute Talk Contributions 10:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St John's College, Oxford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on St John's College, Oxford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warwickshire quarry development

[edit]

An IP editor (or editors) has added the following paragraph to the lead twice, sourced to a student newspaper: It also owns agricultural land in Warwickshire and is attempting to drive through a controversial sand and gravel quarry development on this.[1]

References

  1. ^ Kenney-Herbert, Issy (2020-11-01). "Local residents campaign against St John's quarry plans". Cherwell. Retrieved 2021-10-01.

I have reverted this as it is a routine news report and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. St John's is a large landowner and will from time to time propose controversial developments but most of these will not be of lasting significance. Including this development in the article gives it undue weight. TSventon (talk) 12:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:St_John%27s_College,_Oxford&oldid=1212978346"